The general form of such claims is "every dollar invested in {insert proponent's economic activity here}
I'm not an economist, but it sure seems to me that on the first level of analysis any dollar directed at A is a dollar not directed at B, C or D. Even if the claimed multiplier effect exists, we're still left with questions of which alternatives to A also have multiplier effects and whether or not any hypothetical multiplier effects associated with B, C or D are even greater.
The opportunity costs are never mentioned or considered.
No comments:
Post a Comment